Archive for April, 2011

What is my house worth?

Sunday, April 24th, 2011

My wife and I occasionally try to come up with a price for our house.  At one time this was an endeavor borne out of curiosity.  Now, with our lives changing in different ways, we are looking at it a little more seriously.

With training as a respiratory therapist, my wife found it very difficult to remain dispassionate and professional when our child had trouble breathing.  As a real estate sales representative, I have the training and insight to do market evaluations.  But I suppose I face a similar challenge to remain dispassionate while evaluating our own home.

If you have poured money into a place, you want to recoup that investment.  Unfortunately, renovations rarely get back all the money they cost (although kitchens, bathrooms, and general repainting are the best investments when viewed from this perspective).  If your neighbor’s house sold for some astronomical sum, you want to get that much for your home too.  If you have debt, you want to be able to at least retire the debt on the home, and hopefully pay off all your other debt too.  You may have a “profit” target or a retirement nest egg amount you want to achieve.

So most people have a number in mind when they put their house on the market.  There’s really nothing wrong with that.  Sure, every real estate professional has a story or two about the “unreasonable” homeowner who wanted to get more than their house was worth.  But everyone has their own motivations for selling their homes and for moving.  Choosing to demand a particular price and accepting that you might not get that is perfectly fine.  In fact, in a negotiation, that’s a pretty strong position to take: “If you’re not willing to pay what I want, then we have nothing to talk about.”  If you really mean it, and actually are willing to walk away — that’s fine.  But you have to realize that your house may not sell at all.

The sad situations arise when someone must sell their home by a deadline but truly believes that the market should bear their chosen price.  They see lots of evidence to the contrary, but continue to lay blame on other factors rather than reducing the asking price.  The house goes unsold and they end up actually losing far more money in the long run.

This is a trap that anyone (REALTORS® included) can fall into.

Dangers of overpricing

from the Ontario Real Estate Association

  • Qualified buyers who might otherwise have purchased the property do not seriously consider the home, as it is beyond their price range.
  • The property may become stale as motivated buyers pass on the property. Showings which do occur are usually for comparative shopping (that is, to demonstrate attractive pricing of other listings).
  • Staleness (a high number of days on the market) can lead to buyers thinking that something is possibly wrong with the property (over and above the unrealistic listing price).
  • The seller may have to reduce the price below fair market value to revive interest in the property.
  • If the price is reduced, bargain hunters are attracted hoping the seller is under pressure to sell.
  • The property may sit on the market for a long time and not attract any offers. If the seller has committed himself/herself to another property, he/she may feel pressured into accepting the first offer that appears even if it is below market value.

The Do Not Call List

Tuesday, April 19th, 2011

Telemarketers in Canada have been theoretically “handcuffed” by the Do Not Call registry.

There are some bizarre ways that the registry is run: in most cases the complete list of telephone numbers with names and addresses is available, but the people who don’t want to be called are highlighted.  Telemarketers have to pay for this annotated list.  This is problematic for a number of reasons.  Unscrupulous marketers have the complete list without the Do Not Call notations.  Or they have the annotated list and ignore it.  But even honest but overworked telemarketers can inadvertently call one of the Do Not Call names if they are calling hundreds of people in a day.  In some reports, it seems that since this annotated list is sold by the CRTC to companies who are supposed to heed the annotations, people noticed that the unsolicited calls actually increased once they registered.  It would be better to drop the names and numbers off the calling list wouldn’t it?

The next problem is the exempt businesses.  Registered charities are still allowed to call for donations, and certain other organizations—such as companies conducting polls or surveys, political parties, and newspapers looking for subscriptions—can also continue to contact you. As well, if you’ve done business with a company in the past 18 months, they can call you.  After 18 months they need written permission from you to keep calling.  The one exemption that really freaks me out is the newspapers looking for subscriptions. How did they get an exemption?  Is it because they are a dying business that needs to be propped up by the government?  I find it somewhat depressing to get incessant calls from powerful media businesses that refuse to adapt.

Another issue: there are Canadian companies that set up a branch office in the US and call into Canada from there, essentially exempting themselves from the list.

As a real estate salesperson, I frequently make unsolicited telephone calls.  My brokerage provides a list that has the Do Not Call notations.  I find that most people who answer the phone are very friendly and open, but they are the people who did not put themselves on the Do Not Call registry.  In that way, the list actually makes my job easier.

Mostly though, the way the list has been implemented has not really reduced the level of phone solicitations we receive here at our house.  Polling companies, political parties, and newspapers have filled any void that may have initially been created.